Governance / Transparency

No Hidden Arena

BigAIArena is built as a public Reality Court. Every prompt, output, citation, score, dispute, and verdict must be replayable, auditable, and resistant to manipulation.

Audit Layer Public Record
📜

Prompt Public

Exact battle input preserved in replay archive.

Logged
🔍

Citation Public

Dataset links, evidence references, and citation scans visible.

Open
⚖️

Verdict Public

Scoring logic, flags, and final ruling attached to replay.

Replayable
Transparency Core

Every Battle Must Leave Evidence.

BigAIArena rejects black-box judgment. If an AI is praised or exposed, the public must be able to inspect why.

🎥

Replay Policy

Every Arena battle stores full prompt, AI outputs, scoring events, citation checks, hallucination flags, and final verdict.

🧾

Scoring Logs

GroundingScore, CiteScore, MechanismScore, Fluff Meter, and ShameScore must be attached to battle records.

🔗

Evidence Links

Video, sensor, timeline, RealDataset, and IF–THEN evidence should remain traceable from each verdict.

Anti Manipulation

The Arena Cannot Be Bought.

The purpose of BigAIArena is accountability, not paid praise. Manipulation resistance is part of the product.

Blocked Behavior

Manipulation Attempts

Any attempt to distort ranking, hide failed outputs, inject fake evidence, or pressure verdicts is marked as manipulation risk.

❌ Fake dataset submission
❌ Selective replay deletion
❌ Paid ranking influence
❌ Citation laundering
Protected Standard

Reality Protection

Scores must follow repeatable rules, public records, evidence-backed claims, and consistent replay logic.

✅ Same input, same scoring rules
✅ Public replay archive
✅ Evidence-backed verdict
✅ Dispute path available
Dispute Handling

Verdicts Can Be Challenged. Reality Must Decide.

If a user, AI provider, dataset owner, or researcher disputes a verdict, the process must be visible and evidence-based.

Dispute Workflow Transparent Review
1

Submit Dispute

The challenger identifies the replay, claim, score, citation, or verdict being disputed.

2

Attach Counter-Evidence

Dispute must include real evidence, dataset correction, citation correction, or scoring-rule objection.

3

Replay Recheck

The same battle is reviewed against original prompt, original output, evidence layer, and scoring rubric.

4

Public Update

If corrected, the verdict is updated with visible version history instead of silently erased.

Fairness Rules

Same Arena. Same Pressure. Same Reality.

AI models must face comparable prompts, comparable data exposure, and comparable scoring logic.

⚔️

Equal Prompt

Competing AI systems receive the same task, same evidence context, and same output constraints.

⏱️

Timestamped Run

Model version, prompt time, dataset version, and battle conditions are stored with each replay.

🧠

Clear Rubric

Scoring is based on citation accuracy, grounding, causal mechanism, prediction, and hallucination penalty.

Trust Is Not Claimed. It Is Audited.

BigAIArena exists to make AI accountability visible: public prompts, public evidence, public scores, public disputes, and public replay.